February 18, 2020, 10:00:34 pm

The Gang Garrison 2 Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:


NOTICE: Due to a rise in bot activity, new posters need to be approved before posting.
Chat with us online! (or @irc.esper.net/#gg2)
Come Mumble with us!

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: Starfox Discussion  (Read 3403 times)

Muddywater

  • rotaredoM
  • Veteran Beta Tester
  • *****
  • Karma: 107
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2356
  • Hi.
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #15 on: July 28, 2010, 04:55:27 pm »

I loved assault. The multiplayer was awesome, but unbalanced and not very fun without 4 players.
Once you have wolf there's no need for the others  :z4:

Also jetpacks on zones sea base was awesome.
Logged
This message requires a Gold Forum Account™ in order to be read. Activate your free trial for gold membership by hitting CTRL+W!

ThermalInferno

  • Guest
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #16 on: July 28, 2010, 04:57:46 pm »

 I hated aparoid queen.
Logged

9NINE9

  • Seasoned Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 15
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2294
  • I never come down, I'm high alone
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #17 on: July 28, 2010, 04:58:08 pm »

Star fox command was enjoyable for a bit,until i found out it had NINE DIFFERENT ENDINGS!
I can swear there are more than that

but yeah lots of endings

I didn't like the online (no customizability) or the fact that it was now 1/3 tactics...
Logged

ThermalInferno

  • Guest
Re: Starfox and Kirby Discussion
« Reply #18 on: July 28, 2010, 05:15:36 pm »

 I swear they couldn't decide on a plot.Also i felt like changing this into a kirby disscusion as well,there may be one if so ill take out the kirby part.
Kirby's Epic Yarn - Official E3 Trailer [HD]
« Last Edit: July 28, 2010, 05:16:42 pm by ThermalInferno »
Logged

Trueblade

  • Veteran Beta Tester
  • *****
  • Karma: 25
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2299
  • Ike is my spirit animal
    • Steam Profile
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #19 on: July 28, 2010, 08:09:36 pm »

Ah yes, Assault's multiplayer proved quite entertaining whenever I could gather three friends who were willing to play. Wolf is broken, too much health.

Jetpack matches are a blast.
Logged

[TacoNinja]

  • Seasoned Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 567
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2675
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #20 on: July 29, 2010, 07:57:20 pm »

Assault is the best simply because the multiplayer kicks ass. Unfortunately, I never unlocked Wolf or jetpacks :z7:
There was so damn much to unlock it was crazy awesome.
Logged

Muddywater

  • rotaredoM
  • Veteran Beta Tester
  • *****
  • Karma: 107
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2356
  • Hi.
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #21 on: July 29, 2010, 08:04:52 pm »

Assault is the best simply because the multiplayer kicks ass. Unfortunately, I never unlocked Wolf or jetpacks :z7:
There was so damn much to unlock it was crazy awesome.
Set it to single lives, go to the dino planet, have a race with friend to see who can kill themselves the fastest, works since you unlock stuff by the match amounts.
Logged
This message requires a Gold Forum Account™ in order to be read. Activate your free trial for gold membership by hitting CTRL+W!

[TacoNinja]

  • Seasoned Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 567
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2675
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #22 on: July 29, 2010, 08:11:16 pm »

Assault is the best simply because the multiplayer kicks ass. Unfortunately, I never unlocked Wolf or jetpacks :z7:
There was so damn much to unlock it was crazy awesome.
Set it to single lives, go to the dino planet, have a race with friend to see who can kill themselves the fastest, works since you unlock stuff by the match amounts.
Ah

I used to set it to snipers in the inner space base place and play Lazer quest, heh heh.
Good motherfuckin' times.
Logged

UNDERWATER BASKETWEAVING

  • Seasoned Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 297
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3053
  • Waiting for the little busters
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #23 on: July 29, 2010, 08:24:17 pm »

CAN'T LET YOU BREW THAT, STARBUCKS

CAN'T LET YOU BROWSE THAT, FIREFOX
Logged
My Twitter
(PC)(RMS)(GC)

this is just like that one harry potter puppet pals only BasketWeaving is both Ron and Harry and everyone else is snape.

RebelINS

  • Martial Expert
  • *
  • Karma: 400
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6865
  • I am a rising contender, confident to win.
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #24 on: July 29, 2010, 10:02:33 pm »

CAN'T LET YOU DO IT LIVE, FOX NEWS.

[TacoNinja]

  • Seasoned Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 567
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2675
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #25 on: July 29, 2010, 10:18:39 pm »

I liked the Starbucks one
Logged

Muddywater

  • rotaredoM
  • Veteran Beta Tester
  • *****
  • Karma: 107
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2356
  • Hi.
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #26 on: July 29, 2010, 11:51:32 pm »

CAN'T LET YOU MOVE THAT, BIG TRUCKS

CAN'T LET YOU INFECT THAT, CHICKEN POX
Logged
This message requires a Gold Forum Account™ in order to be read. Activate your free trial for gold membership by hitting CTRL+W!

[TacoNinja]

  • Seasoned Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 567
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2675
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #27 on: July 29, 2010, 11:57:09 pm »

Starbucks is bess pun
Logged

a/d

  • pro donglosaur
  • *****
  • Karma: 371
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4989
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #28 on: July 30, 2010, 09:47:53 am »

I liked how you couldn't save progress on 64, since it made me feel like I was playing a big boy arcade game.

Also, through repeated failures on Aquas and whatever the sun one is called, I was fucking beast at Corneria.
Logged
go canada or whatever, maybe your country is cool too

[TacoNinja]

  • Seasoned Member
  • *****
  • Karma: 567
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2675
Re: Starfox Discussion
« Reply #29 on: July 30, 2010, 11:41:40 am »

Aquas is the underwater one, and it's hard as fuck.
I think you're referring to Solar, where your jet takes damage just because it's so hot, that one was hard too.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
 

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 35 queries.