|
NAGN
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: April 11, 2012, 08:06:28 am » |
|
We're always going to have horizontal whitespace, which isn't much of a problem assuming that all our users are using modern internet browsers that know how to deal with it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
  [im |
|
|
|
Footpöp
|
|
« Reply #31 on: April 11, 2012, 11:38:48 pm » |
|
conform
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team /ABC/  |
|
|
|
Dusty
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: April 11, 2012, 11:45:00 pm » |
|
Wareya, is that a coded in necessity (like if they aren't they break things), a 'fuck you I'm a mod/dev so what I say goes' need or an ocd need?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Phantom Brave
|
|
« Reply #33 on: April 11, 2012, 11:45:47 pm » |
|
ocd
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Linkin Park lyrics here |
|
|
|
Footpöp
|
|
« Reply #34 on: April 11, 2012, 11:56:34 pm » |
|
it's good ocd
squares are nice
having everybody have different avatar sizes is really nasty
and is only maginified if the avatars are bigger, because then you have sensible people with sensible avatars and gey puppyfgts like intel with avatars that stretch the page all over like a new born's anus.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team /ABC/ |
|
|
|
Intel Guard
|
|
« Reply #35 on: April 12, 2012, 12:06:39 am » |
|
I'm just gonna completely disregard you two lunatics and press this issue anyway :p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Also some random girl from my school yelled out her pickup truck window, asking if I wanted to be her boyfriend when I was at my house  |
|
|
|
MedO
|
|
« Reply #36 on: April 12, 2012, 04:45:12 am » |
|
Lanczos resize keeps things just a little bit sharper (technically it's slightly too sharp AFAIK, but I prefer slight aliasing to blurry edges). Also, the forum does not resize the avatars, that's actually your browser, so quality depends on that. Oh, right, increased avatar size? Doesn't seem like a bad idea, but I'd prefer not to go overboard. How does 100x100 sound (see second image)? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It is the business of the future to be dangerous; and it is among the merits of science that it equips the future for its duties. [...] if you have a large enough codebase, any class of error that is syntactically legal probably exists there. |
|
|
|
Intel Guard
|
|
« Reply #37 on: April 12, 2012, 12:42:54 pm » |
|
I suppose that's alright, though I liked the idea of 150x200 much better, and so far the only people who have a problem with non-square avatars have been wareya and footpop.
100x100 look alright though
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Also some random girl from my school yelled out her pickup truck window, asking if I wanted to be her boyfriend when I was at my house |
|
|
|
Machidro
|
|
« Reply #38 on: April 12, 2012, 01:46:27 pm » |
|
I'm not yet convinced, so for now I'll advocate the status quo. I don't see a need for bigger avatars, they seem all right small.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A CHALLENGER HAS ARRIVED.
|
|
|
|
Waterfall
|
|
« Reply #39 on: April 12, 2012, 03:27:54 pm » |
|
Sounds good to me. Let's go with that and then we can check back a bit later
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Meower
Elder God tier or Fagthulu, the great
Community Manager
 Offline
Posts: 21819
Went fat once, never went back
|
|
« Reply #40 on: April 15, 2012, 04:23:40 am » |
|
  I'm not really digging it Also a lot of the avatars of other people are still incredibly small compared to the others, so if you guys really wanna keep this size I suggest you have those miniature avatars automatically resize to the maximum permitted size |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MedO
|
|
« Reply #41 on: April 15, 2012, 04:55:07 am » |
|
Why don't you install the Stylish plugin and make your own style adjustments then?  I don't really want to resize small avatars automatically because some of them are meant to be the size they are, and it would cause blurring. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It is the business of the future to be dangerous; and it is among the merits of science that it equips the future for its duties. [...] if you have a large enough codebase, any class of error that is syntactically legal probably exists there. |
|
|
Meower
Elder God tier or Fagthulu, the great
Community Manager
Offline
Posts: 21819
Went fat once, never went back
|
|
« Reply #42 on: April 15, 2012, 04:56:41 am » |
|
Just sayin' that they look bad compared to the bigger ones, if people like having them like that, suit yourself, I don't quite care how my 85+ pictures are seen like
Also oh god Medoloid could have used some more polishing on my part now that I see it again
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 15, 2012, 04:57:17 am by Meower »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MedO
|
|
« Reply #43 on: April 15, 2012, 04:58:11 am » |
|
Feel free to send me an improved version if you want  Edit: Also, the new avatar size is in effect since an hour now, give people some time to adjust theirs. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 15, 2012, 04:59:09 am by MedO »
|
Logged
|
It is the business of the future to be dangerous; and it is among the merits of science that it equips the future for its duties. [...] if you have a large enough codebase, any class of error that is syntactically legal probably exists there. |
|
|
|
Smokey Joe
|
|
« Reply #44 on: April 15, 2012, 04:58:46 am » |
|
Hey, my old avatar actually animates like it's supposed to now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
~ Smokey Joe
|
|
|
|
