|
CrazNoDale
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: December 13, 2011, 07:39:51 am » |
|
So if a clan says they are a fluff clan, but they war a lot would they then become a competitive clan? So many loopholes that its not even funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedBluYellow
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: December 13, 2011, 07:42:23 am » |
|
They have categorized themselves under fluff clan, therefore they can't become a comp clan unless they meet the requirements (6 players that are in no other clans registered, not being inactive).
Plus, if that clan was made for the intention of warring a lot they shouldn't have registered themselves under fluff clan category.
There may be still loopholes since we still need to cover everything.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 13, 2011, 07:43:43 am by RBY »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Neal_Shireman
|
|
« Reply #62 on: December 13, 2011, 07:59:06 am » |
|
So clans like ~$b's^c'sv$~ would be able to dodge activity warnings for an indefinite ammount of time?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedBluYellow
Guest
|
|
« Reply #63 on: December 13, 2011, 08:05:21 am » |
|
So clans like ~$b's^c'sv$~ would be able to dodge activity warnings for an indefinite ammount of time?
2 weeks max or something along those lines, not more. But no clan is not going to get any posts for that long |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CrazNoDale
Guest
|
|
« Reply #64 on: December 13, 2011, 08:09:00 am » |
|
I am debating whether to make BRO a fluff clan or competitive. Also why 6? Why can't it be 10 or something?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedBluYellow
Guest
|
|
« Reply #65 on: December 13, 2011, 08:52:24 am » |
|
6 or 7 would leave room for people to join other clans instead of good players all stacking to one good clan, then smashing all the other clans, with 'mediocre' players. It wouldn't be steamroll wars, things would almost even be even.
Besides, only 4 of those registered people need to show up (well technically 3, since 1 sub is allowed). This encourages clans to be a bit more organized and discuss with their members what time they can all show up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CrazNoDale
Guest
|
|
« Reply #66 on: December 13, 2011, 09:01:38 am » |
|
Alright whatever. Can't argue with that, but wouldn't that be the point. People don't wan't to join clans that they don't like.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedBluYellow
Guest
|
|
« Reply #67 on: December 13, 2011, 09:06:19 am » |
|
Out of the 15 clans we have right now, at least 1 other than the one they first had in mind should appeal to the person, no? Why else would people be in so many clans at this moment? You yourself are in multiple Craz.
Besides, people can always create new clans with people who have not yet been registered if they want to play with people they know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CrazNoDale
Guest
|
|
« Reply #68 on: December 13, 2011, 10:31:57 am » |
|
Yes, I am in multiple, BRO, PHS, and THA. Clan limits would result in people making alts though. But in my opinion 2 is a good number. With the member limit 10. But again, I'm the only one fighting against this which probably means that the others favor this. So yeah, I'm just saying you would need 10 more moderators to enforce this well and all of them would have to be able to see IP's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedBluYellow
Guest
|
|
« Reply #69 on: December 13, 2011, 10:34:45 am » |
|
Why? All me and Comp have to do is update the clan's list to divide it into two groups. One of those groups will get spoilers including the registered members of each clan. That doesn't take 10 people  On the topic of alts, I'll have to go over that with Medo. If we can't see IP's, there's nothing I can about that. It's their problem if they want to create multiple alts to be in clans... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CrazNoDale
Guest
|
|
« Reply #70 on: December 13, 2011, 10:44:56 am » |
|
Alts are the main issue on the clan limit. The problem with enforcing the clan members limit is that say if the limit is 6 people and you have 8. You can just communicate with them using Skype and they can just change their name. Or the clan can lie that a member left and he has been recently added. Which also can bypass the 1 sub rule.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedBluYellow
Guest
|
|
« Reply #71 on: December 13, 2011, 10:46:47 am » |
|
Alts are the main issue on the clan limit. The problem with enforcing the clan members limit is that say if the limit is 6 people and you have 8. You can just communicate with them using Skype and they can just change their name. Or the clan can lie that a member left and he has been recently added. Which also can bypass the 1 sub rule.
What do you mean with this? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CrazNoDale
Guest
|
|
« Reply #72 on: December 13, 2011, 10:51:53 am » |
|
Can't explain it well with my phone because it limits the amound of characters
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CrazNoDale
Guest
|
|
« Reply #73 on: December 13, 2011, 10:55:59 am » |
|
Alright I will just say this and no more. In my opinion, the clan limit and the clan member limit is too low.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedBluYellow
Guest
|
|
« Reply #74 on: December 13, 2011, 11:02:15 am » |
|
If we're going to implement the clan limit, 1 would be ideal. Otherwise, the original purpose of this all is lost. 6 or 7 is really enough for every clan. You only need 4 out of those to play. This will require clans to be organized, yes, but that's something some clans don't have at this moment which they actually do require.
Honestly Craz, the only reason you are probably against this is not because you think it won't work but because you are in 3 clans yourself, am I right? But be honest with yourself, are you as devoted to THA or PHS as you are to your clan BRO?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 13, 2011, 11:03:27 am by RBY »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
