|
[GA]10char
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: October 03, 2010, 05:54:55 am » |
|
I thought you meant the thread owner could appoint a mod of that thread.
No. This means the thread owner could delete posts in that thread. I thought. You don't have to explain it again. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Name is actually ten characters
[PHS] [GA] [♣] [KKK] [GGG] [TIC] [SS] =SZP= [CU]
|
|
|
|
Spiralstorm
Guest
|
|
« Reply #31 on: October 03, 2010, 10:32:54 am » |
|
There's nothing wrong with the setup we have now. Why should this even be considered?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AJF
Guest
|
|
« Reply #32 on: October 03, 2010, 10:34:13 am » |
|
There's nothing wrong with the setup we have now. Why should this even be considered? mods too lazy |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spiralstorm
Guest
|
|
« Reply #33 on: October 03, 2010, 10:37:00 am » |
|
There's nothing wrong with the setup we have now. Why should this even be considered? mods too lazy We have a reason to be lazy, because nothing ever needs moderating, except for a stupid topic you make every once in a while to try to look funny. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AJF
Guest
|
|
« Reply #34 on: October 03, 2010, 10:39:17 am » |
|
There's nothing wrong with the setup we have now. Why should this even be considered? mods too lazy We have a reason to be lazy, because nothing ever needs moderating, except for a stupid topic you make every once in a while to try to look funny. Well. My problem is threads sometimes need cleaning up, but no mod will clean it up because they don't want to. If a thread's creator could delete posts in a thread, they could self-moderate it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spiralstorm
Guest
|
|
« Reply #35 on: October 03, 2010, 10:41:59 am » |
|
That would be all fine and dandy, but there's 2 problems with that. 1. When has a moderator been too lazy to clean something up? It's their job to do that, and if they don't they should get the boot. 2. Moderators are supposed to be an unbiased 3rd party. Topic creators are biased. Having someone biased moderate their own thread would not be too good.  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 03, 2010, 10:42:34 am by Doctor Malpractice, PHD »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AJF
Guest
|
|
« Reply #36 on: October 03, 2010, 10:47:05 am » |
|
That would be all fine and dandy, but there's 2 problems with that. 1. When has a moderator been too lazy to clean something up? It's their job to do that, and if they don't they should get the boot. 2. Moderators are supposed to be an unbiased 3rd party. Topic creators are biased. Having someone biased moderate their own thread would not be too good. 1. I've requested in past and they haven't. 2. True. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
One
Guest
|
|
« Reply #37 on: October 03, 2010, 08:35:14 pm » |
|
okay so i tl;dr'd through this topic
i think the "giving OP to other person" idea is okay enough, especially in the case of clans when a leader may want to not stop leading but must be away for a while.
the other shit is just something that only butthurt people would want
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spiralstorm
Guest
|
|
« Reply #38 on: October 03, 2010, 09:03:34 pm » |
|
The only place I think this would actually be good in is clans.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DSky
|
|
« Reply #39 on: October 03, 2010, 11:08:58 pm » |
|
Giving the ability to other people to edit the OP is something I support.
But everthing else (editing or deleting posts on your own thread) can be easily exploited.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[SOS] [VAL] Needs more maids
Everything is better with maids
|
|
|
|
Spiralstorm
Guest
|
|
« Reply #40 on: October 04, 2010, 05:31:16 am » |
|
I think that the gain out of giving someone the ability to edit the OP would really only be useful in the clans section, and then the leader can just edit it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AJF
Guest
|
|
« Reply #41 on: October 04, 2010, 10:23:05 am » |
|
* AJF (also known as Taze T. Schnitzel) gives up. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dusty
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: October 04, 2010, 06:42:24 pm » |
|
Actually, it could be useful in the new/playable project sections as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
One
Guest
|
|
« Reply #43 on: October 04, 2010, 08:14:34 pm » |
|
* AJF (also known as Taze T. Schnitzel) gives up. what are you trying to prove? i tl;dr'd, i don't know |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spiralstorm
Guest
|
|
« Reply #44 on: October 04, 2010, 08:29:52 pm » |
|
He's trying to prove that something like this would do more good than harm.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
