+-+!!!February Four vs Four Tourney Fest!!!+-+ (Giving IRC interviews)

[Snare]

I actually like Techno's idea for round robin (I hope we don't have to do round robin though). If it's too complicated, I guess we could do +2 for win, +1 for tie, +0 for loss. If it isn't round robin, we'll probably need a clear cut winner though.

And your sudden death sounds like NFL OT. Have you watched NFL OT, bleh. It would end up with both teams hardcore camping and sending a scout out to get the intel until he happens to die enough times trying to get it that he moves it to his own base.

As for maps as many legit maps as we can get would be nice. I'll probably finalize the map list this weekend though.

Edit: Added Ren to the LFG List

[Blazephlozard]

in a 4v4 match i'm p sure it's not going to be possible to have a tie :|
and points mean absolutely nothing so 100% replay the match :|

[Snare]

I'm pretty sure it won't be a tie too, but you gotta be somewhat prepared.

[8Bit]

I believe a redo would be better, It'll give more epic moments in the game, plus the fact that it would be pretty fair.

[Techno Viking]

I believe a redo would be better, It'll give more epic moments in the game, plus the fact that it would be pretty fair.

but would take more time

logistics

[Snare]

I don't think I've said this yet but the transistion map will be ctf_wizard. As in it's not an official map, so don't get confused when it comes up. When both teams are ready to continue to the next map, just cap until the game is finished.

@8bit: I wouldn't mind redoing the matches, but I'm sure people have other things to do besides play gg2. The best solution is of course don't tie.

[8Bit]

Fair 'nough.
So why not the sudden death idea?
First one to cap wins?

[Snare]

Fair 'nough.
So why not the sudden death idea?
First one to cap wins?

And your sudden death sounds like NFL OT. Have you watched NFL OT, bleh. It would end up with both teams hardcore camping and sending a scout out to get the intel until he happens to die enough times trying to get it that he moves it to his own base.

[8Bit]

Fair 'nough.
So why not the sudden death idea?
First one to cap wins?

And your sudden death sounds like NFL OT. Have you watched NFL OT, bleh. It would end up with both teams hardcore camping and sending a scout out to get the intel until he happens to die enough times trying to get it that he moves it to his own base.

Hm,
Why not limit the amount of times a person can do that?
and by that I mean grabbing a dropped intel during sudden death.
Just throwing around Idea's.
It'd stop the problem stated above.. Unless the other members start to do such.

[Snare]

You can't limit it in the vanilla version, and it sounds like it would get complicated limiting all the "bad" tactics.

Another reason I don't like it is because it doesn't give you a chance to counter cap if the other team gets lucky in the opening minutes.

[8Bit]

You can't limit it in the vanilla version, and it sounds like it would get complicated limiting all the "bad" tactics.

Another reason I don't like it is because it doesn't give you a chance to counter cap if the other team gets lucky in the opening minutes.

So what are you going to do if everyone votes redoing the match?
Will you just decide that, that's not a good idea and go for second in line?

[Snare]

You can't limit it in the vanilla version, and it sounds like it would get complicated limiting all the "bad" tactics.

Another reason I don't like it is because it doesn't give you a chance to counter cap if the other team gets lucky in the opening minutes.

So what are you going to do if everyone votes redoing the match?
Will you just decide that, that's not a good idea and go for second in line?

It's pretty evenly split right now, and popular opinion isn't always the best opinion fyi. The only reason I put a poll for something up in my tournement is when I either can't decide or more than one option could be useful. The problem with re-doing matches is that we have 10 people that all have different schedules that are trying to get together for a set time. Re-doing matches may mean that a team will have to drop a teammate because he has other obligations, or the matches won't get recorded.

[8Bit]

You can't limit it in the vanilla version, and it sounds like it would get complicated limiting all the "bad" tactics.

Another reason I don't like it is because it doesn't give you a chance to counter cap if the other team gets lucky in the opening minutes.

So what are you going to do if everyone votes redoing the match?
Will you just decide that, that's not a good idea and go for second in line?

It's pretty evenly split right now, and popular opinion isn't always the best opinion fyi. The only reason I put a poll for something up in my tournement is when I either can't decide or more than one option could be useful. The problem with re-doing matches is that we have 10 people that all have different schedules that are trying to get together for a set time. Re-doing matches may mean that a team will have to drop a teammate because he has other obligations, or the matches won't get recorded.

Sorry If I'm annoying you in any way, I'm just trying to get an understanding here, then when I get another understanding, I end up questioning something else. It's just my nature.
I have a need to make up ideas/questions.

[favicon guru]

Round Robin is more effective and will reduce disputes over the games. "TECHNO VIKING BAWWW ILL BE ELIMINATED."

They can just take their -1 and suck it up in Round Robin.

[Vyse Inglebard, King of Rogues (Ghost of Legend)]

Hit the Ball Agh is gonna win this tourney via a steamroll.

Calling it now.

This merits repetition.